Last week, luxury label Lanvin debuted its new line for girls ages 5 to 10. The dresses — all pink ruffles and tiered chiffon and dreamlike confections — were adorable, as were the kiddies modeling them for the company’s lookbook, which featured little girls jumping out of shopping bags and carrying dolls with matching Lanvin outfits.
Still, the idea of Lanvin for kids perturbed some critics. Some groused that spending hundreds of dollars on a silk trench for a 5-year-old is impractical , since she will grow out of it in six months — and probably spill something on it, rip it or destroy it some other way before then. Others saw Lanvin’s foray into childrenswear as downright nefarious. One blogger called it “ unethical “; another, an example of capitalism run amok .

Comments: 19
I think your question is nonsense.
SICKOS
I haven't seen this at all and I've lived in liberal urban areas full of liberal women for the last decade.
idk.
This appears to be more of a rant than a question. Try going to a forum; I think you may be in violation of the community guidelines.